1992 Mazda 323 vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1992 Mazda 323 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 323. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 430 kg more than 1992 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Mazda 323 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 323 | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | 323 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1992 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 6392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2830 mm |