1992 Mazda 323 vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 1992 Mazda 323 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 323. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 430 kg more than 1992 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Mazda 323 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Mazda 323 1966 Mercury Cougar
Make Mazda Mercury
Model 323 Cougar
Year Released 1992 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 6392 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 185 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4600 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1230 kg 1660 kg
Vehicle Length 4090 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2830 mm