1992 Mazda 323 vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 323. (74 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1992 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 323. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Mazda 323 1996 Rover 200
Make Mazda Rover
Model 323 200
Year Released 1992 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1324 cc 1395 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 104 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 3700 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 930 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4040 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2510 mm