1992 Mazda 323 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 323. (74 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 323. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 323 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 323 | 3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |