1992 Mazda 323 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 323. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 682 kg more than 1992 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 323. (235 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 323. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1992 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1992 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda 323 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | 323 | XTS |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 11.5 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2831 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 76 L |
