1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1949 Riley RM A
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Riley RM A weights approximately 80 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Because 1949 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 1949 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | 626 | RM A |
Year Released | 1992 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2870 mm |