1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 626 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1992 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 115 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2540 mm |