1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda 626 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 626 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 91 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
