1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1968 Seat 1500
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1968 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 124 kg more than 1968 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 1968 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 626 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |