1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (221 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | 66 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |