1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1982 Zastava 2101

To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 2101. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 2101.

Compare all specifications: