1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,473 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 25 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass (179 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda 626 | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 626 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2473 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2640 mm |
