1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1986 Ford Fairlane

To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,089 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Fairlane (137 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 487 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Fairlane (304 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 1986 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626. 1986 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 1992 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1992 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: