1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 1997 Rover 414i is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 176 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (221 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 1997 Rover 414i | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 626 | 414i |
Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 167 Nm |
Top Speed | 219 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1460 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2780 mm |