1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1997 Tata E
To start off, 1997 Tata E is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1997 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1997 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Tata E weights approximately 86 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Because 1997 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (221 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 1997 Tata E | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | 626 | E |
Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2810 mm |