1992 Mazda 626 vs. 1999 Saturn SL
To start off, 1999 Saturn SL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Saturn SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1999 Saturn SL. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1999 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1999 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Saturn SL (158 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 1999 Saturn SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda 626 | 1999 Saturn SL | |
| Make | Mazda | Saturn |
| Model | 626 | SL |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
