1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy
To start off, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy (133 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 395 kg more than 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy.
Because 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy (178 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda 626 | 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy | |
| Make | Mazda | Pininfarina |
| Model | 626 | Enjoy |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 133 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1080 mm |
