1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2004 Opel Tigra

To start off, 2004 Opel Tigra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Opel Tigra. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Tigra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Tigra weights approximately 55 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Opel Tigra. (125 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Opel Tigra.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Mazda 626 2004 Opel Tigra
Make Mazda Opel
Model 626 Tigra
Year Released 1992 2004
Body Type Station Wagon Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 1364 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 89 HP
Torque 157 Nm 125 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Top Speed 192 km/hour 175 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1235 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2500 mm