1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (135 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 175 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn L (199 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 2004 Saturn L | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | 626 | L |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 135 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 199 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |