1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2005 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2005 Toyota Opa is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Opa weights approximately 55 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 2005 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 626 | Opa |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |