1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1104 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 34 kg more than 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Because 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
Make | Mazda | SSC |
Model | 626 | Ultimate Aero |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 6350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 1269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6075 RPM |
Top Speed | 219 km/hour | 437 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1090 mm |