1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Caddy

To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Caddy. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 185 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Caddy (250 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2009 Volkswagen Caddy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Mazda 626 2009 Volkswagen Caddy
Make Mazda Volkswagen
Model 626 Caddy
Year Released 1992 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 1896 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 104 HP
Torque 157 Nm 250 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 95.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1365 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2690 mm