1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (221 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 626 | Megane |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 80.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2690 mm |