1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford C-Max (150 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 230 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford C-Max (240 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2011 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 626 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2648 mm |