1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2011 Kia Forte

To start off, 2011 Kia Forte is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Forte (156 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Forte weights approximately 61 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Kia Forte (195 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2011 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Mazda 626 2011 Kia Forte
Make Mazda Kia
Model 626 Forte
Year Released 1992 2011
Body Type Station Wagon Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 156 HP
Torque 157 Nm 195 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1241 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4481 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2649 mm