1992 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2012 Seat Exeo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2012 Seat Exeo. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2012 Seat Exeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Seat Exeo weights approximately 116 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (221 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Seat Exeo. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Seat Exeo.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda 626 | 2012 Seat Exeo | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 626 | Exeo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Top Speed | 219 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1772 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2642 mm |