1992 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 2003 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2003 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 456 kg more than 1992 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 2003 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda AZ-1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1992 Mazda AZ-1 has manual transmission. 1992 Mazda AZ-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda AZ-1 | 2003 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | AZ-1 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1176 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1450 mm |
