1992 Mazda Eunos vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1992 Mazda Eunos is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mazda Eunos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda Eunos (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda Eunos should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda Eunos weights approximately 342 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda Eunos (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda Eunos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda Eunos | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | Eunos | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1992 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 25 L |