1992 Mazda Eunos vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda Eunos would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda Eunos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda Eunos.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda Eunos | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Eunos | E-350 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1806 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 57 L |