1992 Mazda Eunos vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda Eunos would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC60 (240 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda Eunos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 612 kg more than 1992 Mazda Eunos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda Eunos.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda Eunos | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Eunos | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1842 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2748 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |
