1992 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1954 Rover P4
To start off, 1992 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,230 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda MX-3 | 1954 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | MX-3 | P4 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 80 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |