1992 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda MX-3 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | MX-3 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2770 mm |
