1992 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda MX-3 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | MX-3 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3010 mm |