1992 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda MX-3 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | MX-3 | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3010 mm |
