1992 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda MX-3 | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | MX-3 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2880 mm |
