1992 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda MX-3 | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | MX-3 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3310 mm |