1992 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda MX-3 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | MX-3 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2845 mm |