1992 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda MX-3 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Mazda | Mini |
| Model | MX-3 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2595 mm |
