1992 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1992 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (239 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1954 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot Baby weights approximately 350 kg more than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda RX-7 | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Mazda | Talbot |
| Model | RX-7 | Baby |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2693 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3130 mm |
