1992 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1992 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (239 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 275 kg more than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda RX-7 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | RX-7 | Zo |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 83 L |
