1992 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (239 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 974 kg more than 1992 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda RX-7 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-7 | Armada |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 106 L |