1992 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2008 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Opel Omega is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1992 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Opel Omega weights approximately 29 kg more than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (270 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Omega. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda RX-7 | 2008 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-7 | Omega |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2615 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |