1992 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1992 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda RX-7 (239 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1992 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mazda RX-7 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | RX-7 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2685 mm |