1992 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (239 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mazda RX-7 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-7 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 239 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 296 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
