1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 (134 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 (190 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mercedes-Benz 200 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | 200 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2685 mm |