1992 Mercedes-Benz S vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercedes-Benz S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercedes-Benz S would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mercedes-Benz S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mercedes-Benz S | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jaguar |
Model | S | XF |
Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 464 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2909 mm |