1992 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL. (231 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 280 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Pontiac |
| Model | SL | Tempest |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2962 cc | 6376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2930 mm |
