1992 Mercury Capri vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Capri would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Capri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mercury Capri (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Capri should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Capri weights approximately 50 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mercury Capri (130 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1992 Mercury Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mercury Capri | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Capri | Clio |
Year Released | 1992 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2480 mm |