1992 Mercury Capri vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Capri would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (241 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Capri. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1992 Mercury Capri. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercury Capri. (130 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercury Capri.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mercury Capri | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Capri | C70 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 241 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |