1992 Mercury Cougar vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1992 Mercury Cougar is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I.
Because 1992 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Mercury Cougar has automatic transmission and 1962 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1962 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Mercury Cougar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mercury Cougar | 1962 Mini MK I | |
Make | Mercury | Mini |
Model | Cougar | MK I |
Year Released | 1992 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1420 mm |