1992 Mercury Tracer vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Tracer. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Tracer.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Mercury Tracer | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Mercury | Acura |
Model | Tracer | TL |
Year Released | 1992 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1859 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2840 mm |